Decisions

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

¶1 Before the Court are (1) the affidavit of Respondent Lee Griffin, filed pursuant to Rule 8.1, Rules Governing Disciplinary Proceedings (RGDP), 5 O.S.2021, ch. 1, app. 1-A, requesting that this Court allow her to resign from the Oklahoma Bar Association (OBA) and relinquish her right to practice law; and (2) the OBA's Application for Order Approving Resignation Pending Disciplinary Proceedings.

No Description Available, please check the website.

No Description Available, please check the website.

¶ 1 The State of Oklahoma ex rel. Oklahoma Bar Association (Complainant) has presented this Court with an application to approve the resignation of Joseph Dewayne Kalka (Respondent), OBA No. 33206, from membership in the Oklahoma Bar Association. Respondent wishes to resign pending disciplinary proceedings and investigation into alleged misconduct, as provided in Rule 8.1 of the Rules Governing Disciplinary Proceedings (RGDP), 5 O.S.2021, ch. A, app. 1-A, https://govt.westlaw.com/okjc. Upon consideration of the Complainant's application and the Respondent's affidavit in support of resignation, we find:

Court of Criminal Appeals

SWAGER v. STATE

2024 OK CR 12, F-2022-620Decided 05/02/2024

¶1 Appellant, Kevin Swager, was tried and convicted by a jury in the District Court of Delaware County, Case No. CF-2021-92, of Count 1: Child Sexual Abuse -- Victim Under Twelve (Rape in the First Degree by Instrumentation), in violation of 21 O.S.Supp.2019, § 843.5 ; and Count 2: Child Sexual Abuse -- Victim Under Twelve (Lewd Molestation), in violation of 21 O.S.Supp.2019, § 843.5 . The jury sentenced Swager to twenty-five years imprisonment on each of the two counts.

JACKSON v. STATE

2024 OK CR 11, F-2021-485Decided 04/18/2024

¶1 Marcus Larod Jackson, Appellant, was tried by jury with co-defendant Juwan Square and found guilty of Count 1, racketeering, in violation of 22 O.S.2011, § 1403 (A); Count 2, conspiracy to commit racketeering, in violation of 22 O.S.2011, § 1403 (D); Counts 3 and 4, discharging a firearm into a dwelling, in violation of 21 O.S.2011, § 1289.17A ; Count 5, assault and battery with a deadly weapon, in violation of 21 O.S.2011, § 652 (C); Count 6, shooting with intent to kill, in violation of 21 O.S.2011, § 652 (A); and Counts 7 and 8, possession of a firearm after former conviction of a felony, in violation of 21 O.S.Supp.2014, § 1283 (A), in the District Court of Cleveland County, Case No. CF-2019-417. The jury found Counts 1 through 6 were committed after former conviction of two or more felonies, and Counts 7 and 8 were committed after former conviction of a felony; and assessed punishment of sixty years in each count. The Honorable Michael D. Tupper, District Judge, pronounced judgment and ordered the sentences to be served concurrently. 1 Mr. Jackson appeals in the following propositions of error:

POSEY v. STATE

2024 OK CR 10, D-2019-542Decided 04/18/2024

¶1 Appellant Derek Don Posey appeals his Judgment and Sentence from the District Court of Canadian County, Case No. CF-2013-463, for his First Degree Murder convictions and death sentences for the deaths of Amy Gibbins (Counts 1 and/or 2) and her son, Bryor Gibbins (Counts 3 and/or 4), in violation of 21 O.S.Supp.2012, § 701.7. 1 Posey's jury fixed punishment at death for both murder convictions after finding the same three aggravating circumstances as to each victim, namely: (1) that Posey knowingly created a great risk of death to more than one person; 2 (2) that the murders were especially heinous, atrocious, or cruel; 3 and (3) that there existed a probability that Posey would commit criminal acts of violence that would constitute a continuing threat to society. 4 The Honorable Bob W. Hughey, Associate District Judge, presided over Posey's jury trial and sentenced him to death for each murder pursuant to the jury's verdicts, with all sentences to be served concurrently. 5 Posey raises eleven claims for review; however, no claim warrants relief. We affirm Posey's Judgment and Sentence.

Court of Civil Appeals

¶1 United Automobile Insurance Company appeals from a judgment entered upon a jury verdict in which the jury awarded Karen Swain compensatory damages for United's breach of the covenant of good faith and fair dealing and punitive damages, and the trial court's award of attorney fees. We reverse and remand with directions to enter judgment for United.

¶1 Plaintiff Phil Boevers Enterprises, Inc., appeals the trial court's orders vacating a default judgment against Defendant Gabriella Beck and vacating a judgment against Garnishee Allstate Fire and Casualty Company. After review, we affirm.

GARRETT v. BELL

2024 OK CIV APP 13, 120999Decided 10/27/2023

¶1 Plaintiffs David M. Garrett and the Garrett Law Office (collectively "Garrett") appeal an order granting summary judgment on their claims against attorney Richard A. Bell and the Bell Law Firm, LPPC (collectively "Bell"), in this attorney's fee dispute. Garrett sought declaratory judgment as to the enforceability of a fee-splitting or referral agreement against Bell, and asserted various related contract and tort claims. 1 Bell asserted that an agreement to share fees on any particular case was unenforceable under Oklahoma Rule of Professional Conduct 1.5(e), and that Garrett's claims to fees should have been brought during proceedings for fees before the Workers' Compensation Court of Existing Claims (CEC) and were barred by the doctrine of res judicata or claim preclusion. The district court granted summary judgment to Bell. On review of the applicable law and the record, we affirm the trial court's judgment of December 21, 2022, in part, with respect to eighteen cases Bell did not litigate in the CEC, and reverse the remainder of the district court's judgment, and remand for further proceedings.

News

On Tuesday, June 4, 2024, the Judicial Nominating Commission (JNC) will conduct interviews for the position of District Judge of Lincoln County. The following individuals have applied for this position:

  • Sarah Lynne Bridge, Chandler
  • Joseph Alan Dobry, Chandler
  • Emily Jean Mueller, Chandler
  • Mark James Pordos, Chandler
  • Zachary Allen Privott, Chandler

Immediately following the interviews, the JNC will provide the Governor a list of three nominees, and the Governor will have 60 days to make the appointment from those nominees.

The JNC strongly encourages the public to continue submitting comments on these applicants. Comments may be mailed to:

Administrative Office of the Courts
Attn: Gina Antipov
2100 North Lincoln, Suite 3
Oklahoma City OK 73105

and/or

James Bland
Chair, Judicial Nominating Commission
17 East Carl Albert Parkway
McAlester, Oklahoma 74501

The Bryan County Courthouse will be closed Friday, May 10, 2024, all day. This is due to the fact that they will be repairing the waterlines at the Bryan County Courthouse, and the water will be shut off all day. Any filing deadlines will be extended by one day because of this closure.

Court of Civil Appeals

121,604 - Nicholles Brooke vs. Keith Reed, RN, MPH, CPH, in his Official Capacity as Oklahoma State Department of Health Commissioner.

The appellant's motion for oral argument is granted. The matter is set for oral argument before this Court on Thursday, March 7, 2024, at 10:00 a.m., in the courtroom of the Tulsa Divisions of the Court of Civil Appeals, 201 West 5th Street, Suite 600, Tulsa, Oklahoma.

121,192 - St. Anthony South Behavioral Health and SSM Health Care Corp. (OWN RISK) v. Monica Moreno Goodwin and The Workers' Compensation Commission

This case is set for oral argument on Wednesday, May 15, 2024, at 10:00 a.m., in the Court Room of the Court of Civil Appeals, 1915 N. Stiles, Suite 357, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma.

Supreme Court Oral Argument Videos

Oral Argument Videos Page

Disclaimer:
The OSCN staff makes every effort to ensure that every document published here is one hundred percent accurate and the overwhelming majority of the materials we publish are one hundred percent accurate. Nevertheless, in those rare instances where there is a discrepancy between the version of a document published here, and the official version of that document, the official version shall govern.